Lose the small point to win the big one

Fighting every point makes you look like someone who fights every point.

Not every hill matters. Give away the ones that don't — quickly, generously, on the record — and your refusal to move on the one that does becomes credible. A person who concedes nothing is discounted; a person who concedes freely is believed when they hold.

Instead of

No, I also disagree with that, and that, and I don't accept the premise of—

Try

You're right on the timing and the cost — happily conceded. The one I won't give you is the safety point, and here's why.

Try it today

In your next disagreement, give away one point on purpose before defending the one that matters.

The science

Two-sided messages that acknowledge the opposing case are more persuasive than one-sided ones for informed audiences (Allen, 1991 meta-analysis; Hovland's WWII studies).

Where you'd actually use it

Next lesson

All 30 lessons →

Knowing it and doing it are different skills.

FlowTalk drops you into the argument where "lose the small point to win the big one" is the thing that saves you — and judges what you actually said.

Make your case — free